tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3239313829122603192.post4428097201287136369..comments2023-12-28T23:52:54.169+00:00Comments on Chelmsford Anglican Mainstream: Sydney: Move to empower laity raises church ireAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03590979027426082714noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3239313829122603192.post-5506621705797242952007-09-21T08:08:00.000+01:002007-09-21T08:08:00.000+01:00QOf course people need to be recognised and licens...Q<BR/>Of course people need to be recognised and licensed by the bishop in order to adminster the Lord's Supper. You can't have any Tom, Dick and Harry, as it would bring the Church into disrepute<BR/>A<BR/>And it isn't in disrepute already?<BR/>Q<BR/>S'ppose<BR/>A<BR/>I mean it wasn't any Tom, Dick and Harry that brought the Anglican Communion to the brink of schism<BR/>Q<BR/>Well, no, it was Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3239313829122603192.post-79190766466888225852007-09-19T20:45:00.000+01:002007-09-19T20:45:00.000+01:00QAn interesting dilemma: Sydney is in favour of la...Q<BR/>An interesting dilemma: Sydney is in favour of lay administration of the Lord's Supper and opposed to gay bishops; the anti-gay constituency is made up of conservative evangelicals, charismatics and catholics; to push ahead with the lay administration agenda is going to wind up the catholics and wreck the anti-gay alliance.<BR/>A<BR/>Is lay administration right? Is opposition to the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com